A survey of the Association's members has found that, when comparing the market this October to the same time last year, 83 per cent of agents have found that requests for market appraisals have dropped, with 9 per cent of respondents finding a reduction of more than 50 per cent.
When asked about the change in the number of instructions for 3 or more bedroom properties, 76 oer cent stated that they had seen decreases in excess of 10 per cent of which 46 per cent had seen a drop in excess of 30 per cent. This compares with a much smaller reduction for 1 or 2 bedroom properties with 37 per cent of respondents finding a drop of more than 10 per cent.
Peter Bolton-King, chief executive of the NAEA, commented: "Clearly everyone accepts that there are a number of financial and economic factors that have caused the market to take a breather after 7 hectic years. However, these figures show that there is an anomaly between instructions on properties where a HIP is required and where one is not.
"I have heard of many examples where potential sellers have decided against putting their property up for sale because they do not want to risk wasting £300 or indeed much more, if they decide not to sell.
“It has been correctly stated previously that many sellers decided to ‘beat the HIP’ by marketing their property before 1 August 2007. It would therefore be reasonable to think that there would be a lull for a few months thereafter.”
The NAEA asked members how available stock levels were year on year - 76 per cent of the 1,050 respondents stated that in October their stock was either the same or less.
Bolton-King explained the significance of this: "At this stage of the market cycle, with sales slowing and normally a traditional autumn bulge in instructions, it would be normal to expect stock levels to be significantly higher.
"The fact that only 24 per cent are saying that this is the case should worry the Government as this is just not normal. This once again appears to show the adverse effect HIPs are having on the market, the lives of consumers and indeed the overall economy."
The survey then went on to ask the question of ‘What should happen to HIPs next? – The NAEA survey gave several options of ways to move forward including the full roll out of HIPs. However, only a tiny 6 per cent felt that this was the right option with 76 per cent stating that HIPs should be scrapped but Energy Performance Certificates should instead apply to all properties.
"Despite the fact that agents have now had an opportunity to work with HIPs it is clear that the vast majority of respondents do not believe that they add value to the process and are finding it hard to get purchasers to take interest in them," he continued. "We feel very sorry for the many Domestic Energy Assessors who are waiting for the opportunity to earn a living.
“As a result we again call on the Government to take into account the above evidence and to reflect on the potential increased damage to the market if they roll HIPs out across all properties. We would urge the Government to take the opportunity to review the situation and find a quick way of enabling the Energy Performance Certificates to be applied to all properties without the need for a HIP."
